The Concept of 4D and the Mass of Nows
The following is a simplified essay on my 4D-The Mass of Nows theory. After multiple revisions, I think it did a pretty good job of explaining it as simply as possible to people with only a minimal knowledge of physics.
I would love to get any feedback, pro or con from any and all of you. - JW
Joseph Wouk’s Mass of Nows theory reimagines time as a series of discrete “now” slices rather than a continuous flow. Each slice represents a moment defined by Planck time—the smallest measurable unit, with about ten to the power of forty-three slices per second. Within each slice, virtual particles, or quantum fluctuations, create a dynamic backdrop that shapes how objects interact with space-time. This interaction provides a fresh explanation for inertia, suggesting that mass and resistance arise not from inherent properties but from the relationship between objects and these now slices.
Why Acceleration Creates a Sensation of Force
When an object accelerates, it is not simply moving through space but is actively shifting its relationship with the sequence of now slices. Unlike steady motion through a single slice, acceleration forces an object to interact rapidly with successive now slices, encountering changes in the arrangement of virtual particles in each slice. This interaction creates a sort of “drag” as the object pushes through the quantum fluctuations of each new slice.
This drag is experienced as a force, felt as the resistance against the change in velocity. Essentially, as an object accelerates, it faces a constant pushback from the virtual particles in the now slices, making acceleration feel like a force being applied in the opposite direction. The sensation of being pressed back into a seat during a car’s acceleration or a rocket launch is a manifestation of this resistance—an interaction with the underlying structure of space-time, as described by the Mass of Nows theory. The faster the acceleration, the greater the resistance from the virtual particles within the now slices, amplifying the sensation of force.
Planck Time, Virtual Particles, and Inertia
In contrast to the traditional view of time as continuous, the Mass of Nows theory proposes that time is granular, composed of countless now slices. Each of these slices contains virtual particles that influence how objects move through space-time. As an object interacts with these particles, it encounters a subtle resistance. This resistance is what manifests as inertia, arising from the intricate relationship between the object and the quantum characteristics of each now slice.
Quantum Indeterminacy and Relativity
A central implication of the Mass of Nows theory is the need for quantum indeterminacy within general relativity. The principle of relativity of simultaneity allows observers in different frames of reference to perceive events differently, yet both perspectives remain valid. For this to be possible, the theory suggests that particles must be able to exist in multiple positions simultaneously. Quantum indeterminacy, enabled by the presence of virtual particles in each now slice, makes this dual existence possible, blending the deterministic nature of relativity with the probabilistic nature of quantum mechanics.
Explaining the Pioneer Anomaly
The Mass of Nows theory also provides a new perspective on the Pioneer anomaly. As the Pioneer spacecraft moves at a constant speed in a single direction, it remains within a single now slice throughout its journey. This consistent motion means it continuously interacts with the virtual particles within that slice, experiencing a minute drag force. Although this drag is barely noticeable over short distances, it accumulates over the vast distances of the solar system, explaining the subtle deviations in the spacecraft’s trajectory.
Conclusion
Joseph Wouk’s Mass of Nows theory offers a fresh lens for understanding the interplay between time, inertia, and quantum mechanics. By viewing time as a sequence of now slices, it suggests that mass and inertia emerge from interactions with virtual particles in each slice. This perspective implies that quantum indeterminacy is essential for the principles of general relativity to hold true, offering a potential bridge between the macroscopic world of gravity and the microscopic world of quantum fluctuations. It challenges us to rethink the nature of time and space, pushing the boundaries of how we understand the universe.
Importantly, the Mass of Nows theory does not propose any changes to our current understanding or practical use of quantum mechanics or general relativity. Instead, it serves as an interpretive framework that complements these existing theories, offering new insights into their intersection. It respects the established principles of both fields while providing a novel way to conceptualize their interaction.
Moreover, when the principle of parsimony is applied, the Mass of Nows theory proves advantageous. It offers a simple and unified explanation for multiple phenomena, making it a more elegant solution compared to other interpretations. By explaining complex interactions with minimal assumptions, the theory aligns with the scientific preference for simplicity, suggesting it could be a valuable perspective in understanding the universe’s underlying mechanisms.
Lefties in ‘meltdown’ over Donald Trump’s ‘epic’ political comeback
Gutfeld! 11 6 24 FULL END SHOW FOX BREAKING NEWS TRUMP November 6, 2024
A.I. Artificial Intelligence (2001) Part 1
Watch the complete film at josephwouk.locals(dot)com.
Anyone who missed this Speilberg film made 24 years ago MUST see this film which is much more relevant now than it was then. - JW
David, an artificial kid which is the first to have real feelings, especially a never-ending love for his "mother", Monica. Monica is the woman who adopted him as a substitute for her real son, who remains in cryo-stasis, stricken by an incurable disease. David is living happily with Monica and her husband, but when their real son returns home after a cure is discovered, his life changes dramatically.
10/10
Can't re-watch it again
I was 13-14 when I watched this movie. It's a long movie if I recall it correctly. I was so moved by it's theme, so I watched it all. I had strong feelings of sadness and sympathy towards little robot David that wanted to be a real child and to have a mom to love him. And that little bear ... I cried during some scenes. I don't ...